Re: One big database or little separate ones?
От | Allan Berger |
---|---|
Тема | Re: One big database or little separate ones? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a05200fa4bc2749159499@[128.255.89.219] обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: One big database or little separate ones? (Eric Frazier <ef@kwinternet.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: One big database or little separate ones?
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
Hi all, This is a great topic for me, as I'm just now starting to consider this very issue. Is there any advantage to maintaining separate databases for backup purposes? Specifically, I am going to have a large number of tables with text info, and just a few tables that saves several gigabytes of images and data files. I was thinking of having the text data in one database to allow for frequent backups (every few hours), with the large image and file database backed up less frequently (once a day or less frequently). Is the balance in backing up several hundred megs of text data frequently v. several gigabytes of less critical binary data a good reason to maintain separate databases? All thoughts welcome... -Allan At 3:11 PM -0800 1/10/04, Eric Frazier wrote: >Hi, > >The only reason to separate databases, is if the data has no relation >from one DB to another. Otherwise, you are just making things hard on >yourself. > >Eric
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: